• Anna's DayBreak News
  • Posts
  • Poll Results and Comments : Iran Hits Israeli Hospital, SpaceX’s Ship 36 Explodes and Twice-Yearly HIV Shot

Poll Results and Comments : Iran Hits Israeli Hospital, SpaceX’s Ship 36 Explodes and Twice-Yearly HIV Shot

Author

Anna Eisenberg
June 19, 2025

Anna's Daybreak News

Just facts, you think for yourself

Given the reported limitations on IAEA’s access to Iran’s nuclear sites, how confident are you in the current monitoring regime’s effectiveness?


  • 84% Doubtful because of access restrictions
  • 9% Confident that monitoring is sufficient
  • 7% Unsure due to co

EmailComments
csbr...Just nuke Israel and get it over with. Their continued genocide against the Palestinians was warranted all that may come. The Israeli government is no different than any other terrorist organization, just like the MAGA movement.
sara...Unsure because I am not knowledgable about IAEA.
noah...Just curious, what kind of access does the IAEA have to Israel?🤔🤔🤔 Surely it's not LESS than Iran right? Wouldn't that be crazy, if Israel was refusing all international nuclear monitoring? Would that justify bombing them?
lesl...I don't believe anything Israel got says right now. I think he attacked because Trump was about to make an agreement Iran
rehs...These folks just can’t be trusted. They have declared a holy war on America for years and have vowed the elimination of Israel . What more proof do we need.
wufw...It has been obvious for a long time that that Iran has not given up its plans to get nuclear bombs just from what we know about their enrichment of uranium. No other purpose.
jon....not just "doubtful." The IAEA's monitoring is a joke.
cica...Iran can’t be trusted. But neither can Israel or the United States.
huma...Israel also has never allowed IAEA access to their nuclear arms or facilities ever and is currently committing genocide. So yeah please be objective and fair.
perm...Iran CANNOT be allowed nuclear weapons. This is not just an Israeli or US issue, but a global threat, regardless of political viewpoints. This is not a new threat, but one that was funded under Obama and allowed to flourish under Biden. Any wealth the regime gains is dedicated to destruction and not toward improving the lives of its citizens. Iran is a terroristic regime and the Iranian people should have a chance to choose differently.
nd1n...Iran cannot be trusted
sara...I'm doubtful because now that Israel (with no restraint from the US) has started this war, all bets are off.
rodn...They say one thing and do another. They will try to get what they want one way or another and time doesn't matter.
rgar...Time to eliminate the threat and terror that Iran has continued to engage in for decades.
jpwp...Without verification and autonomy from central governments it just becomes propaganda. COP: Dr David Kelly and Iraq weapons dossier. No weapons became chemical weapons and dirty bomb capability and perpetual war.
bjta...Iran has proven they cheat at everything. Why would any agency trust them.
mdul...Doubtful, however, I don't think it matters with Trump. When President Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), in May 2018, experts and international bodies stated that Iran was indeed complying with the terms of the agreement. For instance, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the agency tasked with monitoring Iran's nuclear program, repeatedly verified Iran's compliance with its nuclear-related commitments under the agreement. Even Trump's own administration, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, stated that Iran was in compliance with the JCPOA before the withdrawal. US intelligence officials, like Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and CIA Director Gina Haspel, testified that Iran was adhering to the deal's restrictions. Whether it's been complying since hardly seems to matter when the evidence was so overwhelmingly clear before Trump took the steps to enable Iran's nuclear aspirations.
mken...I'm also concerned about how the IAEA has no access to Israel's nuclear sites.
jonh...Iran has enriched uranium far beyond what is needed for nuclear power fuel. It's obvious of their intent to build weapons grade material. The IAEA seems toothless to do anything meaningful with rogue states like Iran.

Given the uncertainty caused by tariffs, should the Fed act proactively by cutting rates sooner or wait for clearer economic data?


  • 63% Wait for more data before changing rates
  • 37% Cut rates sooner to stimulate growth

EmailComments
tomd...I see a much-need voice if reason in the Federal reserve. They take a methodical, data-driven approach to this most important function, and, so far, this team has arguably been spot on in their interest rate decisions and timing. When this fine team unanimously decides to hold rates steady a little while longer based on facts and data (not politics), who am I to question it.
sara...Trump has thrown a booming economy (and declining inflation) into chaos. Since tariffs and massive reductions to benefit programs have already slowed the economy, and no one can predict the mad kings next move, it's best not to make any changes for now.
bjta...The tariffs are already providing profits to the US Treasury. 66 Billion has already been collected. The Trump trade policy is working. We need fair trade with our trading partners. For far too long The US has been taken advantage of with the support of previous administrations, both Democratic and Republican. The numbers stated in this newsletter are prejudiced by The Fed. The 4th quarter of this year will be robust. Not what the Fed is predicting. The inflation rates have already dropped from the highs of the previous Biden administration. The 3% inflation number is bogus.
jose...Self inflicted wounds from Trump tariff.
blik...My son is trying to sell a condo and buy a small house with a few acres. Even with a VA loan, the interest rates are hindering the moves. Either get rid of the FED (a Marx concept put together in secret by bankers and corrupt Senators in 1913) altogether, and let the free market competition set our rates of borrowing, or lower it to stimulate growth. Resistance to this smacks of hate for us in the MAGA movement.
cica...Yes, his Magastry all of his republican blow monkeys in congress Will, whine and complain, but the Fed needs to be independent and stay the course. They need to only respond to the data. If they violate that sacred trust, that’s really about it for the financial markets.
swjo...Powell is more interested in damaging Trump than in doing or being right.
payn...The higher interest rates are hampering home sales and other major purchases. Powel doesn't care if you are paying hundreds more on your mortgage payment.
nanc...The Fed must be independent
bret...Tariffs will mostly slow the economy and reduce profit margins but they will also increase prices. Fed needs clarity before acting. Without Tariffs the fed could reduce rates without much risk of increasing inflation
kenh...It is better to make sure inflation will not be an issue as once prices go up they never go back down when inflation is tempered
arth...Too much turmoil to act under pressure. Perhaps the situation will be clearer more quickly if Trump would go ahead and make a decision on bombing Iran’s nuclear sites, the tariffs etc.
nanc...Too many unknowns in this political climate. Best to wait and see how things play out.
nica...Cut now

Do you believe the significant increase in annual fees for luxury credit cards is justified by the added benefits?


  • 74% No, the fees are too high regardless of perks
  • 17% Unsure / Depends on personal usage
  • 9% Yes, the benefits outweigh the cost

EmailComments
drte...It would be interesting to see the stats on the actual percent of users that use the “added perks” to offset the annual fee.
rodn...The system has no support. The benefits can change at any time. they are fluid.
salt...I won’t pay that annual fee as I do not travel as much as would benefit me. And I have teenagers I am poor
cica...These credit cards are further proof of the wealth disparity in this country. If they can pay ridiculously inflated credit card fees, then they can pay more in taxes
dcin...They make money hand over fist. Downgrading our card. Greedy
nanc...Let them pay the fees. It’s all about status, so if that’s so important to them, they should pay for it. They can always switch to a new card, and pay nothing.
atli...Because only the unworthy rich can afford the card, why not charge $100,000 per year?
bale...The perks don’t equal what the fee is unless you are a consistent often business traveler
bjta...Not sure why anyone would pay these outrageous fees. The perks are simply not worth the additional cost.
ken....When I was younger in the late 90’s I qualified to go from my platinum to the black Centurian card. I did not think that card was worth the price so I went back to my platinum card. I believe the card was about $450 then. I am now retired these past 18 years and continue with my platinum card. I have been with Amex for over 43 years. If they raise the card to over $895 I will tell Amex they can take back their card.
shaw...I have united chase. The benefits aren’t always relevant to me because of where I live and how I live my life / so, no, it’s not a wash.
kath...Absolutely ridiculous. I can't imagine how people became affluent while displaying such ignorance as far as their spending habits.

Given the repeated Starship test failures, do you think SpaceX’s ambitious timeline for lunar missions is realistic?


  • 69% No, the timeline is overly optimistic
  • 31% Yes, setbacks are normal in space exploration

EmailComments
jade...Seems from the number of failures reported in 2025 that the company is rushing to some goal that is unknown to me but is going to cause a catastrophe one of these days.
geof...Elon is overly ambitious with timelines on everything he does.
nanc...They clearly are over their head and need to step back and reconsider.
vmdr...Our Federal government needs to reevaluate our federal funding for SpaceX and the return on investment.
cica...I think Bosch company has reached the limits of their gravity. Like the orbiting planets, what we’re going to get is continued improvements of his existing products, but they’re not gonna push out the boundaries any further. They’re at the limits of their technological expertise. It’s gonna have to be a new generation.
bjta...I am sure the Musk/Trump haters on this newsletter undoubtedly think otherwise. Don't ever count out the ingenuity of the Musk led SpaceX team. You will always have setbacks in programs. This is normal in product development.
atli...Every time one explodes the cost eventually will be absorbed by the taxpayer under present and future contracts with NASA and Musk needs the money more than poor people. And since private corporations are obligated to maximum return then we can expect many more failures. What again was the goal?
sara...The company is run by a lunatic who forced them to disregard basic safety regulations. Move fast and break things may work with software, but actual technical building takes attention to detail. Musk is famous for lying about delivery schedules and product capabilities- which gets people killed. The feds should compel the company to slow down and do things with more care, or take the money back for NASA to do the work
djmo...So far, SpaceX has demonstrated a willingness to push forward when able and pause only when they face an actual challenge rather than a feared or imagined roadblock.

Given the high cost of Yeztugo compared to generic PrEP, do you believe its twice-yearly dosing justifies the price difference?


  • 78% No, affordability should be prioritized over dosing
  • 22% Yes, less frequent dosing improves outcomes enough to justify cost

EmailComments
fnpn...Here’s a third option. Let’s try to live a more biblically based and moral life.
nanc...Unclear how much their competitor is charging.
cica...It’s more important to prevent disease than to save money doing so. They need to find a way to make it more affordable.
dcin...If more people take it the price should come down.
lind...who can afford that?!? absurdity

Should future medical research prioritize blocking LINE-1 activity to prevent diseases like cancer and neurological disorders?


  • 60% Yes, targeting LINE-1 could be a game-changer
  • 29% Unsure
  • 11% No, blocking LINE-1 may have unintended consequences

EmailComments
cica...Interesting to see what RFK would have to say about this? He’s a know-nothing nut job.