- Anna's DayBreak News
- Posts
- The Longevity Race - Part II: Core Interventions – From Caloric Restriction to Epigenetic Reprogramming
The Longevity Race - Part II: Core Interventions – From Caloric Restriction to Epigenetic Reprogramming
Anna's Deep Dives
Just facts, you think for yourself
Caloric Restriction & Dietary Approaches
The Science Behind Calorie Restriction and Intermittent Fasting
Calorie restriction (CR) reduces food intake without causing malnutrition. Scientists began testing CR in the 1930s. Mice on a 40% reduced-calorie diet lived about 36% longer than normal.
This effect isn’t limited to mice. Monkeys and other animals also show longer lives and fewer age-related diseases under CR. A study in humans showed that cutting calories by just 12% reduced the risk of early death by 10% to 15%.
CR activates a process called autophagy. Cells clean out damaged parts and reuse them. This slows aging and protects against diseases like cancer and heart problems.
CR also lowers inflammation. People on restricted diets show better heart health, metabolism, and immune response. In one study, calorie-cutting stabilized telomeres—DNA caps that normally shorten with age.
CR influences aging pathways like mTOR and AMPK. These regulate metabolism and energy use in cells. Studies in yeast showed some strains extended their lifespan by 75% under CR.
Timing matters. Mice that ate only during active hours lived 35% longer. In humans, eating patterns aligned with our body clock may improve results.
Intermittent Fasting (IF) is another method. It involves periods of eating and fasting. One common style is the 16:8 approach—eating during 8 hours, fasting for 16.
IF improves body composition, heart health, and metabolism. In a study with 960 mice, both CR and IF extended lifespan. But they work differently. CR cuts overall intake. IF changes when we eat.
CR and IF both reduce blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol. They may also protect against diabetes, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease.
CR affects everyone differently. Genetics account for about 23.6% of lifespan variation. Diet's effect grows with age. In older animals, CR has a stronger impact.
Studies in humans show benefits even with small changes. A vegan diet, for example, naturally cuts daily calories by about 200. In twin studies, those on vegan diets showed better aging markers.
CR and IF are hard to follow long term. That’s why scientists are testing caloric restriction mimetics. These are compounds like spermidine or metformin that mimic CR's effects without reducing food intake.
Other mimetics include rapamycin, resveratrol, and D-allulose. They target the same aging pathways. Some have shown lifespan extension in animals.
Still, results in humans remain under study. Some mimetics may raise cholesterol or carry other risks. More trials will show if they can safely slow aging in people.
The science is clear: eating less, eating better, and timing meals right can affect how we age.
CR Mimetics (e.g., resveratrol, rapalogs)
Caloric restriction (CR) helps organisms live longer and stay healthier. But cutting calories by 30–50% is hard to maintain. Scientists are now studying compounds that mimic CR without requiring people to eat less. These are called caloric restriction mimetics (CRMs).
CRMs activate the same pathways as CR. They boost metabolism, reduce inflammation, and support cellular repair. Some of the best-known CRMs include resveratrol, rapamycin, spermidine, and metformin.
Resveratrol is a natural compound found in red wine, grapes, blueberries, and dark chocolate. It has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Research shows it may protect the heart and fight diseases linked to aging.
However, resveratrol has poor absorption in the body. A glass of red wine contains only 0.2 to 0.5 mg, while studies often use 100 to 2,000 mg. High doses may cause side effects, including digestive issues and liver stress.
Studies show mixed results in humans. Some research links resveratrol to reduced lung inflammation. Others find little impact at safe doses. Its role in healthy aging remains under review.
Rapamycin and related drugs, called rapalogs, have shown stronger effects. These compounds inhibit a protein called mTOR, which regulates cell growth and aging. Blocking mTOR can trigger autophagy, the cell’s cleanup process.
In mice, rapamycin has extended lifespan by up to 60%. It also improves immune function and lowers inflammation. Human trials suggest rapalogs may enhance vaccine responses and reduce infection rates in older adults.
A 2022 review of 19 human studies showed that rapalogs help the immune and cardiovascular systems. However, they may raise cholesterol and carry long-term risks. A trial in 264 older adults found that low doses of mTOR inhibitors improved immunity without severe side effects.
More research is needed to understand how rapalogs affect the brain, muscles, and long-term safety. But they are now central to aging research.
Other promising CRMs include spermidine, found in wheat germ and soy, and D-allulose, a low-calorie sugar substitute. These compounds support protein cleanup and energy balance. In animals, they reduce disease risk and improve organ function.
Metformin, a diabetes drug, also shows potential. It lowers blood sugar, reduces inflammation, and may help protect against cancer and heart disease. Trials like TAME (Targeting Aging with Metformin) aim to test its effects on lifespan.
Practical Applications, Controversies, and Current Clinical Evidence
Caloric restriction (CR) is simple in theory—eat less, live longer. Studies in mice and monkeys show that cutting calories by 30–40% can extend lifespan by up to 36%. A human study found that reducing calorie intake by just 12% lowered early death risk by 10–15%.
People apply CR through strict meal plans or intermittent fasting. One common method is the 16:8 rule—fast for 16 hours, eat during an 8-hour window. This can reduce calorie intake by 10–30% without needing to count calories.
The Longevity Diet by Dr. Valter Longo supports a form of CR. It focuses on plant-based foods and includes two meals and a snack each day. Participants showed better muscle mass and lower cholesterol.
Some studies show that time matters too. Mice that ate only during active hours lived 35% longer than those with unrestricted access to food. This suggests that when we eat may be as important as how much we eat.
CR also changes gene expression and cellular repair. It activates pathways like mTOR and AMPK. These control metabolism, energy use, and aging. CR boosts autophagy, a process that clears out damaged cell parts.
Despite the promise, CR faces challenges. It is hard to follow long-term. It may not be safe for older adults, underweight individuals, or those with certain medical conditions. Extreme diets can also lead to nutrient deficiencies and muscle loss.
There’s debate over “blue zones”—regions where people live over 100 years. Some experts question the data accuracy in places like Okinawa and Sardinia. Critics argue that faulty records may have inflated longevity numbers.
The rise of CR mimetics adds another layer. These include compounds like D-allulose, spermidine, and metformin. They aim to give CR benefits without cutting calories. But human studies remain limited.
Celebrities and tech entrepreneurs fuel more debate. Bryan Johnson reportedly spends $2 million per year on anti-aging routines, including over 100 daily supplements. Some of his methods, like plasma infusions, lack clinical backing.
Access is another concern. Many emerging longevity treatments are expensive. This raises questions about fairness and who gets to benefit from new science.
Still, current clinical evidence supports moderate CR and time-restricted eating. A review of 91 studies found that intermittent fasting improves weight loss, metabolic health, and heart markers. CR may also cut 10-year cardiovascular risk by 30%.
Diets like the Mediterranean and Okinawan diets also show strong results. These patterns lower mortality and reduce disease risk without extreme restriction. For most people, these offer a more practical path to healthier aging.
Please support us by checking out our sponsor below—your clicks make a big difference!
Amazon Prime isn’t just about fast shipping and streaming. There are 10 hidden perks that could completely transform the way you shop, save, and enjoy Prime. If you’re not using these benefits, you’re missing out on the full value of your membership. Check out this list of exclusive features and start unlocking the full potential of your membership today.
A quick click on our sponsor's ad goes a long way—thank you for your support! 😀
Don’t want to see ads anymore? Click here for an ad-free experience
Epigenetic Reprogramming
Introduction to Epigenetics and Yamanaka Factors
Epigenetics is the study of how cells control gene activity without changing the DNA code. These changes turn genes on or off. They affect how cells grow, divide, and age.
As people grow older, their cells accumulate damage. One result is cellular senescence, where cells stop dividing and start releasing harmful signals. This state drives inflammation and contributes to age-related diseases like Alzheimer’s, cancer, and heart disease.
Chemical tags, such as methyl groups, attach to DNA and change how genes work. These tags build up with age and lead to dysfunction.
One breakthrough came in 2006, when Japanese scientist Shinya Yamanaka discovered a way to reprogram adult cells. He used four proteins: Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc—now known as the Yamanaka factors.
These factors can reset adult cells into a youthful, stem-like state. They create induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that can become almost any cell in the body. This avoids the ethical problems of using embryonic stem cells.
The discovery earned Yamanaka a Nobel Prize. It launched the field of cellular reprogramming, now central to longevity science.
Researchers have tested Yamanaka factors in mice. One study found that elderly mice treated with them lived twice as long as untreated mice. Another showed improved brain function and better motor skills after partial reprogramming.
Using all four factors at full strength can cause cancer. But using only three—Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4—or delivering them in short cycles avoids this risk. In early tests, these partial approaches reversed signs of aging in multiple tissues.
Yamanaka factors help restore mitochondria, repair DNA, and reduce inflammation. AI tools now improve precision, increasing the number of responsive cells by up to 50 times.
Clinical trials are starting. Life Biosciences will test its ER-100 therapy for eye diseases that currently have no cure. The trial uses Yamanaka factors to try and restore damaged vision.
This is only the beginning. Scientists believe reprogramming could one day treat heart failure, neurodegeneration, and immune decline. As the global population over 60 grows toward 2.1 billion by 2050, these breakthroughs could reshape aging itself.
Reversal of Cellular Aging in Model Organisms and Early Human Trials
Scientists have begun to reverse cellular aging in animals. These breakthroughs offer clues to how we might slow or even undo aging in humans.
At UCLA, researchers changed gene activity in fruit flies. They lowered levels of a protein called F-actin. This improved brain function and extended lifespan by 25% to 30%.
In mice, Yamanaka factors have shown powerful effects. One study found that aged mice treated with them lived 18 weeks longer than untreated ones. They also showed better memory and brain function.
At the University of Barcelona, scientists used Yamanaka factors to improve neuron growth. Mice performed better in motor and social tests. In Alzheimer’s models, the same treatment reduced toxic plaques and boosted neural connections.
Some researchers now use cycles of reprogramming instead of continuous exposure. This prevents cancer risk while still rejuvenating cells. Cyclic treatments also improved memory and reduced inflammation.
Beyond mice, scientists tested a microRNA called miR-302b in aging mice. It extended lifespan by 15.4% and improved physical strength. This may lead to new gene therapies for age-related decline.
Researchers have also used gene editing. In the African turquoise killifish, CRISPR/Cas9 achieved a 97.6% success rate. This fish ages quickly, making it a valuable model for testing anti-aging strategies.
One marine animal—the comb jellyfish—can revert to an earlier stage of life under stress. This natural reset could inspire new ways to reverse aging in humans.
In roundworms, a compound named Telomir-1 doubled their lifespan. The worms moved more easily and lived longer. Scientists are studying its potential for treating early aging disorders like progeria.
The next step is human trials. In late 2025, Life Biosciences will begin testing its therapy, ER-100. It uses partial reprogramming to treat eye diseases like glaucoma and NAION.
The therapy uses three of the Yamanaka factors: Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4. Early tests in monkeys showed no tumors. This cleared the way for human studies.
Researchers will track safety and biological effects in Phase 1 trials. They are also working on new delivery methods, including ones modeled after mRNA vaccine technology.
Opportunities, Risks, and the Path to Translational Therapies
Epigenetic reprogramming offers powerful new tools to fight aging. It works by changing how genes behave without altering the DNA sequence. This approach could help treat diseases like Alzheimer’s, cancer, and glaucoma.
Drugs that target epigenetic changes already exist. The FDA has approved several, including azacitidine and vorinostat, which treat blood cancers. More are in trials, aimed at modifying gene activity.
Yamanaka factors can reprogram adult cells into stem cells. In mice, they extended lifespan, improved brain function, and reduced aging signs.
Companies are testing these tools in humans. Life Biosciences will launch a Phase 1 trial of its ER-100 therapy in 2025. This trial will test reprogramming factors in people with optic nerve damage.
Other startups are entering the race. One company, 199 Biotechnologies, raised $6.5 million for trials to restore youthful cell function through gene expression resets.
Still, risks remain. Turning adult cells into stem cells can cause tumors. The c-Myc factor is linked to cancer. To reduce this risk, researchers now use only a partial set of factors.
Even safer methods face hurdles. Reprogrammed cells may behave unpredictably, especially from older donors. Genetic variability and long-term safety remain under study.
Some labs are testing chemical alternatives. In one study, six small molecules reversed aging in cells in under a week. These cocktails could offer safer, simpler delivery.
Moving from lab to clinic is slow. Trials are costly and complex. Many promising therapies are still in early stages and may not reach patients for years.
Ethics and access raise concerns. High costs could limit who benefits. Advanced delivery systems may not be practical at scale.
Still, the field is growing fast. The global epigenetics market was worth $14.65 billion in 2023. It could grow to over $61 billion by 2033, driven by demand for aging and cancer therapies.
AI and machine learning are speeding things up. These tools help predict how genes respond to treatments. They also reduce side effects and make therapies more precise.
Please support us by checking out our sponsor below—your clicks make a big difference!
Amazon Prime isn’t just about fast shipping and streaming. There are 10 hidden perks that could completely transform the way you shop, save, and enjoy Prime. If you’re not using these benefits, you’re missing out on the full value of your membership. Check out this list of exclusive features and start unlocking the full potential of your membership today.
A quick click on our sponsor's ad goes a long way—thank you for your support! 😀
Don’t want to see ads anymore? Click here for an ad-free experience
Pharmacological & Supplement Strategies
Emerging Anti-Aging Compounds (Metformin, Rapamycin)
Metformin is one of the most studied anti-aging drugs. It is commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes and is taken by over 150 million people each year. Researchers now believe it may also extend lifespan and improve healthspan.
Metformin activates AMPK and inhibits the mTOR pathway. These actions improve how cells use energy and manage stress. In elderly male monkeys, long-term treatment with metformin led to brain activity patterns that looked younger.
The TAME (Targeting Aging with Metformin) trial is testing these effects in humans. It will enroll 3,000 people aged 65 to 79. Early data suggest metformin may reduce deaths from cancer, heart disease, and cognitive decline.
Rapamycin is another drug drawing interest. It was first used to prevent organ rejection in transplant patients. It works by blocking mTOR, a protein that drives cell growth and aging.
In mice, rapamycin has increased lifespan by more than 20%. In one study, aged mice given rapamycin lived longer and remained more active. Another study on marmosets showed a 10% increase in lifespan.
Human trials are underway. The PEARL trial found that low doses of rapamycin improved health markers in older adults. Researchers also observed better immune function and quality of life.
Rapamycin is also being tested in dogs. The Dog Aging Project is tracking 580 dogs to see if rapamycin improves lifespan and health.
Still, rapamycin comes with risks. It can raise cholesterol and suppress immune responses. Doctors caution that long-term use needs more safety data.
Some people already take metformin or rapamycin off-label. About 2,000 Americans use rapamycin for anti-aging purposes, despite a lack of full FDA approval for this use. The off-label use trend continues to grow as trials progress.
Nutraceuticals and Their Scientific Support
Nutraceuticals are food-based compounds with health benefits beyond basic nutrition. These include supplements, vitamins, minerals, and plant extracts. Many people now use them to manage age-related decline.
Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) is one of the most studied options. It activates mitochondria, the energy producers in cells. A 12-week study with 71 adults aged 45–65 found that PQQ improved memory and cognitive function.
Withania somnifera, known as Ashwagandha, supports immune function and reduces inflammation. Clinical trials show it helps manage stress and boosts mood in older adults. It may also protect against some age-related illnesses.
Vitamin D plays a critical role in aging health. It helps prevent bone loss and reduces fall risk. The recommended dose is 600 IU per day for most adults, and 800 IU for people over 70.
Antioxidants are another common group of nutraceuticals. A mix of 500 mg of vitamin C, 400 IU of vitamin E, and 80 mg of zinc oxide may slow the progression of age-related macular degeneration. These nutrients help reduce oxidative stress, a key factor in aging.
NAD+ boosters are gaining popularity. Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) increases cellular energy and supports DNA repair. The FDA recommends a maximum of 180 mg per day for a person weighing 132 pounds.
Other popular supplements target visible signs of aging. Collagen improves skin elasticity. Peptides stimulate collagen production from within. Nutricosmetics combine these with skincare ingredients.
TA-65 is a telomere activator marketed to preserve telomere length. It may support cell longevity but carries a risk of uncontrolled cell growth. More studies are needed to confirm safety.
Omega-3s and vitamin D also work well together. A daily mix of 1 gram of omega-3s and 2,000 IU of vitamin D has been linked to slower biological aging and reduced frailty in older adults.
Despite the growth in supplement use, some studies show limitations. One study of over 390,000 people found that multivitamin users had a 4% higher death rate than non-users. This suggests that lifestyle may matter more than supplementation.
Experts agree that exercise, diet, and sleep are the real drivers of longevity. Thirty minutes of daily activity and seven to nine hours of sleep support better aging outcomes. Nutraceuticals may help, but they are not a cure-all.
Off-Label Uses vs. Formal Drug Development Pipelines
Off-label drug use has become common in the anti-aging world. Doctors prescribe approved drugs for unapproved uses based on emerging science. Rapamycin and metformin are two key examples.
Rapamycin was developed to prevent organ rejection in transplant patients. It works by inhibiting mTOR, a protein that controls cell growth and aging. Studies show it can extend lifespan by over 20% in mice and by 10% in marmosets.
Roughly 2,000 people in the U.S. now take rapamycin off-label for longevity. Early reports suggest improved immune function and physical performance. However, side effects like higher cholesterol and infection risk raise concerns.
Metformin, a diabetes drug taken by over 200 million people worldwide, is also used off-label. Some studies link it to lower heart disease rates and better cognitive health. In monkeys, long-term treatment preserved youthful brain activity.
These off-label uses attract attention because the drugs already have safety data. Patients and doctors can act quickly, without waiting for FDA approval for aging. But there are risks. Without large human trials, long-term effects remain uncertain.
The formal path for drug approval is longer and more expensive. It can cost over $4 billion and take 10 years. Only 7.9% of drugs that enter early trials make it to market.
Still, the formal pipeline ensures safety. Trials test drugs in controlled settings, across diverse patients. This process helps uncover risks and interactions that might not show up in off-label use.
The TAME trial is a good example. It will test metformin in 3,000 older adults aged 65 to 79. Researchers aim to find out whether the drug delays the onset of diseases, not just individual symptoms.
Tools like the TxGNN AI model help speed up drug repurposing. It scans data from 7,957 drugs and 17,080 diseases. It has identified over 9,000 new drug-disease matches, raising hopes for faster development.
We don’t take shortcuts, chase headlines, or push narratives. We just bring you the news, straight and fair. If you value that, click here to become a paid subscriber—your support makes all the difference.
Table of Contents
(Click on any section to start reading it)
Setting the Stage
The grand vision for extending lifespan and healthspan
Why is there a “longevity race” now?
Historical Perspectives on Aging
Early theories and how understanding has evolved
Key milestones in gerontology and age-related research
Biology of Aging
Hallmarks of aging (cellular senescence, telomere attrition, DNA damage)
Role of genetics, epigenetics, and environment in aging
Caloric Restriction & Dietary Approaches
The science behind calorie restriction, intermittent fasting
CR mimetics (e.g., resveratrol, rapalogs)
Practical applications, controversies, and current clinical evidence
Epigenetic Reprogramming
Introduction to epigenetics and Yamanaka factors
Reversal of cellular aging in model organisms and early human trials
Opportunities, risks, and the path to translational therapies
Pharmacological & Supplement Strategies
Emerging anti-aging compounds (metformin, rapamycin, NMN)
Nutraceuticals and their scientific support
Off-label uses vs. formal drug development pipelines
Biotech Startups in the Longevity Space
Profiles of high-profile startups (e.g., Altos Labs, Calico, Life Biosciences)
Research focus, funding rounds, and product pipelines
Challenges faced by early-stage biotech (R&D timelines, regulatory hurdles)
Investment & Funding Landscape
Leading venture capitalists, private equity, and philanthropic funding
Billionaires backing longevity (e.g., Jeff Bezos, Peter Thiel) and their motives
Trends in IPOs, M&A, and public market performance of longevity companies
Industry Collaborations & Rivalries
Strategic alliances among startups, pharma, and academic institutions
Patent landscapes, licensing deals, and joint ventures
How competition is driving innovation—and potential duplication of efforts
Moral & Philosophical Questions
Is aging a disease that should be cured, or a natural process?
Implications of radically extending human lifespans
Quality of life vs. longevity trade-offs
Social & Economic Ramifications
Potential strains on healthcare systems, pensions, and social security
Intergenerational equity and shifting demographic structures
Wealth disparities in accessing longevity therapies
The Global Perspective
Cultural attitudes toward aging across different regions
Health disparities: Will new therapies exacerbate or reduce them?
Possible worldwide collaboration or discord over extended lifespans
Aging as a Disease?
Current regulatory status and debates on classifying aging
Approaches by FDA, EMA, and other global regulatory bodies
Implications for clinical trials, reimbursement, and patient access
Intellectual Property & Patent Strategies
Unique challenges in patenting longevity therapies
IP battles and how they shape innovation
Licensing, open-source biology, and collaborative frameworks
Policy Proposals & Government Initiatives
Public-private partnerships for anti-aging research
Proposed legislation and funding programs
Future directions: Encouraging or hindering longevity innovation?
Next-Gen Therapeutics & Technology
Gene editing (CRISPR/Cas9) for senescence and rejuvenation
AI-driven drug discovery for personalized anti-aging therapies
Organ regeneration, tissue engineering, and other moonshots
Predictions & Future Scenarios
Short-, medium-, and long-term outlook for practical breakthroughs
Potential game-changers—where could the field be in 10–20 years?
Risks of hype vs. realistic timelines
Baked with love,
Anna Eisenberg ❤️